Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Saturday, September 28, 2024

Impact of GenAI on R&D Expenditure

 Summary:

  • Describe the AI money flow using an illustration.
  • How much do Adobe, Salesforce, and others spend on Research and Development (R&D)?
  • How has the R&D expense changed over time?
  • What can we infer about the impact of GenAI on R&D expenses?

In this post, we examined Microsoft's capital expenditures (capex) as a proxy for the billions of dollars hyper-scaler cloud providers are investing in AI. Who is consuming this capex? We will answer this fundamental question in this post. Most people may already know the answer to this question. Cloud providers are packaging Nvidia GPUs into various IaaS services, offering them to companies such as Adobe, ServiceNow, Salesforce, and every other company in every industry experimenting with GenAI. These companies' investments in AI show up in research and development expenditures in the income statement.

The AI Money Flow

Here's how the investments in AI flows through various companies. Let's look at each step.

Following the flow of money invested into AI.
Source: Prasanna Rajagopal
  1. Nvidia designs the GPUs.

  2. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) brings Nvidia's dreams to the market.

  3. Dell, HP, and other server manufacturers, primarily based in Asia, buy these GPUs from Nvidia and package them into servers. The cost of the GPUs is included in the server manufacturers' Cost of Goods Sold (COGS).

  4. Cloud providers purchase these servers. The cost of these AI servers is included in the capital expenditures.

  5. Companies worldwide purchase IaaS and PaaS services created by cloud providers to experiment with and create various AI products and services for their customers.

  6. Github Copilot, Salesforce's Einstein AI, ServiceNow AI agent, Apple Intelligence, and other products are examples of GenAI in the marketplace.

  7. Once a product is ready to be released, companies typically create a SaaS service and introduce their GenAI products to consumers and other companies across various industries.

  8. Consumers and companies pay for the GenAI service. Many services currently have a free and paid tier. The free service may typically have some restrictions on product use.

Companies such as Apple, Delta Airlines or Expedia build Chatbots, which they hope would help increase revenue, reduce the cost of serving their customers and thus boost their profit margins. But, most companies bringing GenAI products to market will have to see cost reductions in their operations soon or generate a profitable revenue stream.

Note about #2:

By now, most people are familiar with Jensen Huang, the unassuming, charismatic Nvidia founder. Most people probably have never heard of Morris Chang - the unassuming, spotlight-shunning, nonagenarian Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) founder. Here are a couple of articles to learn more about him:

Note about #5:

The cloud providers themselves are massive users of the GPUs they purchase. Internal product teams at Amazon and Microsoft are experimenting with and creating new GenAI products. These product development expenses appear as research and development (R&D) expenses. So, in addition to spending billions on capital expenditure, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are racing to create new genAI products and, in turn, invest billions more in R&D.

Companies like Adobe, Apple, ServiceNow, Salesforce, and others are investing in GenAI R&D to create new products. Since Adobe, ServiceNow, and others do not buy the GPUs directly and maintain, for the most part, their own data centers, they rely on the cloud providers for their GPU and include the cost of buying those services in R&D. In this post, we will examine how those R&D expenses have changed for these companies with the advent of GenAI.

Note about #7:

When a product is released to the market by the R&D teams, the responsibility of maintaining the service is turned over to the Cloud Operations and Support teams at Adobe, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and others. The cost of providing these services to customers and the associated GPU use is included in the cost of goods sold (COGS).

Research and Development Spending By Companies

Apple's R&D Spending

Apple is one of the largest companies on the planet in terms of revenue, profits, and market value. They have also been slow to announce AI services, only recently announcing Apple Intelligence. Apple is a big R&D spender with one of the largest R&D budgets in the world. Apple spent nearly $30 billion on R&D in 2023.

Chart: Apple's Annual R&D Expense (2007 - 2023)

(Chart Created Using Snowflake Snowsight)

Table: Apple's Annual R&D Spending

Apple's Annual R&D Expense
Queried in Snowflake, Table Formatted in Excel

Apple has increased its R&D budget by 38x since 2007. With the GenAI race just getting started, I do not see these massive expenses abating anytime soon. When you look at the chart below the R&D expense (yellow bar) compared to Revenue (blue bar) looks so tiny.

In fact, Apple only spent 7.8% of revenue on R&D. But, this is the company's highest spend in terms of dollar amounts and as a percent of revenue. The company increased its R&D spend by 114 basis points from 2022, adding over $3 billion to its R&D expense. Apple's motivation to release AI products and services may be behind this increase in R&D expense, especially at a time when its revenue declined from 2022 to 2023.

Chart: Apple's Annual R&D Spending Compared to Revenue

Apple's Annual Revenue & R&D Expense
Created Using Snowflake Snowsight

Table: Apple's R&D Expense As a Percent of Revenue.

Apple's R&D Expense As a Percent of Revenue.
Queried in Snowflake, Table Formatted in Excel

Salesforce's R&D Expense

Let's look at R&D spending by Salesforce and how that's changed over time and feeling the pressure to invest in GenAI. Here's Salesforce's R&D expense compared to its annual revenues.

Chart: Salesforce's Revenue (blue bar) and R&D Expense (yellow bar)

Salesforce's Revenue and R&D Expense
Created Using Snowflake Snowsight

Table: Salesforce's Revenue and R&D Expense as a Percent of Revenue

Queried in Snowflake, Table Formatted in Excel

Salesforce has been spending above 14% of its revenue on R&D since 2017, well above Apple's expenditure in this category. Salesforce has probably decided that it is spending much on R&D already and only needs to reallocate, prioritize funds and teams to focus on GenAI projects.

Microsoft's R&D Expense

Microsoft is already spending plenty on capex. It is spending billions more on R&D. But as a percent of revenue, the company has not increased its spending. On dollar terms Microsoft has definitely increased it spending. Its R&D expense as a percent of revenue in 2024 was lower compared to 2023. But, in dollar terms the company increased its spending by over $2 billion.

Chart: Microsoft Revenue and R&D Expense

Microsoft Revenue and R&D Expense.
Created Using Snowflake Snowsight

Table: Microsoft's Revenue, R&D Expense, and R&D as a Percent of Revenue

Microsoft Revenue, R&D Expense, and R&D As a Percent of Revenue
Queried in Snowflake, Table Formatted in Excel

Companies that have were already spending well above 10% on R&D have probably prioritized the budgets with a focus on GenAI. Megatech companies such as Apple and Microsoft have increased their R&D expense by a few billion dollars. These fresh dollars are mostly likely focused on creating new AI products and services.

Disclosures: I am a Sales Engineer at Snowflake. All opinions in this blog post are solely mine and do not reflect Snowflake's views. I am not a Registered Investment Advisor, and any discussion on securities or investments is not an inducement to make a particular investment.






Friday, January 28, 2022

Invest in an Equal-Weight ETF in these Turbulent Times.

The S&P 500 index is market-capitalization-weighted. The weighting by market cap means the companies with the largest market capitalization (Market capitalization = Number of shares outstanding x Share Price) get the highest weight. Last year, this method for calculating the index made the five largest companies by market cap account for 23% of the index. That is just 5 out of the 500 companies accounting for about a quarter of the market capitalization. These five companies were: Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, and Facebook (Meta). When the share price of these companies starts underperforming, the market takes a huge tumble. We can see that happening now. The S&P 500 index (VOO) is down about 9.72% (pre-market on January 28), while the S&P 500 equal-weighted ETF (RSP) is down 7.48% (See Exhibit 1: Invesco Equal-Weight ETF Beats Vanguard S&P 500 Market-Cap Weighted ETF). That is a difference in the performance of 224 basis points. In essence, the equal-weight ETF outperformed the market-cap ETF. The dividend yield is about the same for both ETFs. The Invesco Equal-Weight ETF charges a higher expense ratio than the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Invesco charges 20 basis points (bps) or 0.2%, while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) charges three bps or 0.03%. Invesco charges 7x more than the Vanguard ETF. Even after deducting the extra expense of investing in the Invesco ETF, it comes ahead in performance by over 200 bps.  

The era of big-tech is coming to an end due to more regulation and their size inhibiting growth. At least for now, Apple seems to be bucking the trend after reporting blockbuster results yesterday. Interest rates are also rising, putting pressure on valuation because future earnings will be discounted at a higher interest rate. It may be good to have a position in the Invesco Equal-Weight ETF (RSP) during these times. 

     Exhibit 1: Invesco Equal-Weight ETF Beats Vanguard S&P 500 Market-Cap Weighted ETF
(Source: Seeking Alpha)
Also, there may be other equal-weight ETFs in the market. I am aware of Invesco's ETF, so I have invested in it. I am not endorsing the Invesco ETF. 

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Can Salesforce (CRM) continue growing to justify its valuation?

Salesforce (CRM) grew at a breakneck speed over the past two decades. The is hoping that the growth will continue in this decade.

The company's free cash flow yield is very similar to that of Microsoft (MSFT) and Adobe (ADBE). Salesforce's free cash flow yield has been consistently around the 2% level over the past decade. Microsoft and Adobe have seen their market capitalization and earnings multiple expand over the years causing their free cash flow yield to drop. I might have to look into their number more closely. 

Exhibit: Free Cash Flow Yield
(Source: Seeking Alpha)

Salesforce is lagging behind Microsoft (MSFT) and Adobe (ADBE) on return on equity. Both those companies have more than 8x more return on equity than Salesforce.  

  Exhibit: Return on Equity

(Source: Seeking Alpha)

Microsoft and Adobe have 6x and 8x more return on invested capital (ROIC) compared to Salesforce. 

Exhibit: Return on Invested Capital 

(Source: Seeking Alpha)


Salesforce's EBITDA margin is much lower than that of Microsoft and Adobe.  

Exhibit: EBITDA Margin
(Source: Seeking Alpha)

Salesforce's EV to EBITDA multiple is higher than that of Microsoft and Adobe.  

                               Exhibit: EV to EBITDA Multiple for Salesforce, Microsoft, and Adobe.  

                                        
   (Source: Seeking Alpha)                                         

Salesforce's year-over-year quarterly revenue growth (See Exhibit: Year-over-Year Revenue Growth) has converged with Microsoft and Adobe.  

    Exhibit: Year-over-Year Revenue Growth

(Source: Seeking Alpha)

Salesforce's price to earnings growth ratio (See Exhibit: Salesforce, Microsoft, and Adobe PEG Ratio) was attractive during the past decade compared to Microsoft and Adobe. If the company's growth can continue, that would justify its higher valuation multiple compared to Microsoft and Adobe. Salesforce's revenue is already in the high $20 billion, so for it to grow at a 20% rate would take some work.  

                                        Exhibit: Salesforce, Microsoft, and Adobe PEG Ratio

(Source: Seeking Alpha)





Thursday, August 6, 2020

Western Digital Had Good Earnings. But Gross Margins Could Improve

Western Digital (WDC) Saw its revenue increase by 18% YoY. It had another record quarter for its flash storage business. Two out of its three business segments did very well. How many companies in today's economy can actually say that it's growing revenue at a double-digit pace?  If you look at the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) 20 out of 30 companies in that index saw YoY EPS decline. 

Exhibit: WDC showed good revenue growth in Q4 FY 2020
(Source: SeekingAlpha)

Its Data Center business continue growing and its revenue increased 32% YoY. Its Client Devices business grew revenue by 19% YoY. But due to the closure of retail stores because of the pandemic, its Client Solutions business suffered.

(Source: SeekingAlpha)

The company has made it a priority to pay down debt. Its gross margins have shown improvement but it could improve further. Gross margin percentage has gone from 24.2% in Q4 FY 2019 to 28.9% in Q4 FY 20.

(Source: SeekingAlpha)

(Source: SeekingAlpha)

For example, the company's non-gaap gross margins were at 43% in Q2 of FY 2018.  So, it's possible for Western Digital to improve its gross margins substantially. 
Exhibit: In Q2 FY 2018 WDC had Good Gross Margins. It's possible for WDC to get to this level again. 
(Source: SeekingAlpha)

I see there could be two drivers for gross margin improvement in the second-half of the year.
  • The release of new video game consoles from Playstation and Xbox should drive demand for storage demand and lift the average selling price (ASP)
  • The company's 16-TB and 18-TB hard drives based on HAMR technology should see good demand in the cloud space. 
I had recently done an article on SeekingAlpha and I had covered both Micron (MU) and Western Digital as part of that.      
(Disclosure: I own both MU and WDC)          

Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Big Tech is Taking a Break From the Rally

    Both Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT) are trading below its 10-day moving average. Apple is down from its 52-week high of $399.82 and currently trades at $380.16. That's a drop from the 52-week high of - 4.97%. Apple's 10-day moving average is 382.436 (Tuesday, July 28, 2020). Microsoft is down from $216.38 to $204.06 that's a -5.6% change. Its 10-day moving average is $202.15. Amazon (AMZN), Facebook (FB), and Alphabet (GOOG) are all trading below their 10-day moving average. Out of this cohort only Facebook is trading below its 50-day moving average. 

Exhibit: Big Tech's Downturn has Started. When will it end? 


(Source: SECURFII)


    Microsoft has gained 53% from its lows in March 2020. Apple has gained 76% form its March 2020 lows.  The gains have been spectacular. Google has gained 50% from its March lows. Amazon has gained nearly 82% from its March 2020 lows.     

    It seems like all these stocks are starting a downward trend after the huge run-up they have had over the last few years and the rebound they have had since the pandemic induced crash of March 2020.           

Impact of GenAI on R&D Expenditure

 Summary: Describe the AI money flow using an illustration. How much do Adobe, Salesforce, and others spend on Research and Development (R&a...